Soil erosion modelling: A bibliometric analysis

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoEnxeñaría Civiles_ES
UDC.grupoInvXestión Sostible dos Recursos Hídricos e do Chan (AQUATERRA)es_ES
UDC.journalTitleEnvironmental Researches_ES
UDC.startPage111087es_ES
UDC.volume197es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBezak, Nejc
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Vicente, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T19:33:42Z
dc.date.available2024-10-29T19:33:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstract[Abstract:] Soil erosion can present a major threat to agriculture due to loss of soil, nutrients, and organic carbon. Therefore, soil erosion modelling is one of the steps used to plan suitable soil protection measures and detect erosion hotspots. A bibliometric analysis of this topic can reveal research patterns and soil erosion modelling characteristics that can help identify steps needed to enhance the research conducted in this field. Therefore, a detailed bibliometric analysis, including investigation of collaboration networks and citation patterns, should be conducted. The updated version of the Global Applications of Soil Erosion Modelling Tracker (GASEMT) database contains information about citation characteristics and publication type. Here, we investigated the impact of the number of authors, the publication type and the selected journal on the number of citations. Generalized boosted regression tree (BRT) modelling was used to evaluate the most relevant variables related to soil erosion modelling. Additionally, bibliometric networks were analysed and visualized. This study revealed that the selection of the soil erosion model has the largest impact on the number of publication citations, followed by the modelling scale and the publication's CiteScore. Some of the other GASEMT database attributes such as model calibration and validation have negligible influence on the number of citations according to the BRT model. Although it is true that studies that conduct calibration, on average, received around 30% more citations, than studies where calibration was not performed. Moreover, the bibliographic coupling and citation networks show a clear continental pattern, although the co-authorship network does not show the same characteristics. Therefore, soil erosion modellers should conduct even more comprehensive review of past studies and focus not just on the research conducted in the same country or continent. Moreover, when evaluating soil erosion models, an additional focus should be given to field measurements, model calibration, performance assessment and uncertainty of modelling results. The results of this study indicate that these GASEMT database attributes had smaller impact on the number of citations, according to the BRT model, than anticipated, which could suggest that these attributes should be given additional attention by the soil erosion modelling community. This study provides a kind of bibliographic benchmark for soil erosion modelling research papers as modellers can estimate the influence of their paper.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNejc Bezak and Matjaž Mikoš would like to acknowledge the support of the Slovenian Research Agency through grant P2-0180. Diana Vieira is funded by national funds (OE), through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., in the scope of the framework contract foreseen - DL57/2016 (CDL-CTTRI-97-ARH/2018 - REF.191-97-ARH/2018), and acknowledges CESAM financial support of through (UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020). Jae E. Yang and Pasquale Borrelli are funded by the EcoSSSoil Project, Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI), Korea (Grant No. 2019002820004). Walter Chen is funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan) Research Project (Grant Number MOST 109-2121-M-027-001).es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipCorea. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI); 2019002820004es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPortugal. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; DL57/2016es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPortugal. CESAM; UIDP/50017/2020es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPortugal. CESAM; UIDB/50017/2020es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipTaiwan. Ministry of Science and Technology; MOST 109-2121-M-027-001es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEslovenia. Slovenian Research Agency. P2-0180es_ES
dc.identifier.citationBezak, N., Mikoš, M., Borrelli, P., Alewell, C., Alvarez, P., Anache, J. A. A., Baartman, J., Ballabio, C., Biddoccu, M., Cerdà, A., Chalise, D., Chen, S., Chen, W., De Girolamo, A. M., Gessesse, G. D., Deumlich, D., Diodato, N., Efthimiou, N., Erpul, G., López-Vicente, M. et al. (2021). Soil erosion modelling: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Research, 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2021.111087es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/J.ENVRES.2021.111087
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/39864
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2021.111087es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 Españaes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectSoil erosion modellinges_ES
dc.subjectResearch impactes_ES
dc.subjectParticipatory networkes_ES
dc.subjectSystematic literature reviewes_ES
dc.subjectCitation analysises_ES
dc.titleSoil erosion modelling: A bibliometric analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb1c9753d-3f60-4025-8700-53c4aa750e92
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb1c9753d-3f60-4025-8700-53c4aa750e92

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lopez-VicenteM_2021_Soil-erosion-bib_ER-197-111087.pdf
Size:
15.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: