Can Dominant Runoff Generation Mechanisms Be Disentangled Through Hypothesis Testing? Insights From Integrated Hydrological-Hydrodynamic Modeling

UDC.coleccionInvestigación
UDC.departamentoEnxeñaría Civil
UDC.endPage27
UDC.grupoInvEnxeñaría da Auga e do Medio Ambiente (GEAMA)
UDC.institutoCentroCITEEC - Centro de Innovación Tecnolóxica en Edificación e Enxeñaría Civil
UDC.issue4 (e2024WR039394)
UDC.journalTitleWater Resources Research
UDC.startPage1
UDC.volume61
dc.contributor.authorPerrini, Pasquale
dc.contributor.authorIacobellis, Vito
dc.contributor.authorGioia, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorCea, Luis
dc.contributor.authorSavenije, Hubert H. G.
dc.contributor.authorFenicia, Fabrizio
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-07T14:11:36Z
dc.date.available2026-04-07T14:11:36Z
dc.date.issued2025-04
dc.description.abstract[Abstract]: Identifying flood-inducing processes remains a challenge in catchment hydrology due to the complex runoff dynamics, particularly in semi-arid regions where surface and subsurface mechanisms alternatively drive streamflow across seasons. Tracer data can help identify hydrograph sources, but they are often unavailable or lack sufficient temporal resolution. To aid process identification at the event-scale, we developed an integrated hydrological-hydrodynamic framework and compared multiple model hypotheses informed by hydrological signatures. We systematically tested these hypotheses through falsification, meta-evaluation, spatial validation, and posterior diagnostics, using the semi-arid Salsola nested catchment in southern Italy as case study. While all model structures performed well on common calibration metrics, differences emerged in spatial transferability tests and alternative diagnostic assessments. Some models, despite strong performance, exhibited inconsistent representations of internal runoff mechanisms, indicating that they achieved good results for the wrong reasons. Furthermore, the choice of routing schemes significantly influenced high peak estimations and overall model performance, particularly when Horton-type overland flow was considered. This underscores the need to treat routing methods as a key component in event-scale modeling. Our findings reveal that during consecutive storm events in the study catchment, surface processes dominate the initial stages, whereas subsurface processes become more influential in later events, providing valuable insights that may be applicable to similar semi-arid regions. Overall, we emphasize the importance of hypothesis testing in runoff process identification, which can compensate for the absence of hydrochemical data for hydrograph separation. Additionally, our results highlight the value of a landscape-based modeling approach for distinguishing alternative runoff generation processes.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe present study contains part of the results of Ph.D. research by P. Perrini, whose fellowship (CUP H99J21010150001 n DOT20THYKL-4) is supported by PON project: “Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Innovazione 2014–2020”, risorse FSE REACT-EU,—Azione IV.4—Dottorati di ricerca su tematiche dell'innovazione. This research was supported by the financial resources of the “National Centre for HPC, Big Data and Quantum Computing. Area tematica: Simulazioni, calcolo e analisi dei dati ad alte prestazioni PNRR MUR—M4C2—I 1.4”; and of the “Operational Agreement between the Autorità di Bacino Distrettuale dell’Appennino Meridionale (ABDAM) and the Consorzio Interuniversitario per l’Idrologia (CINID)”.
dc.description.sponsorshipItalia. Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca; CUP H99J21010150001
dc.description.sponsorshipItalia. Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca; PNRR MUR-M4C2-I1.4
dc.identifier.citationPerrini, P., Iacobellis, V., Gioia, A., Cea, L., Savenije, H. H. G., & Fenicia, F. (2025). Can dominant runoff generation mechanisms be disentangled through hypothesis testing? insights from integrated hydrological-hydrodynamic modeling. Water Resources Research, 61(4), e2024WR039394. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039394
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2024WR039394
dc.identifier.issn0043-1397
dc.identifier.issn1944-7973
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2183/47882
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039394
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectRunoff generation mechanisms
dc.subjectHydrological-hydrodynamic modeling
dc.subjectHypothesis testing
dc.subjectFlexible model structure
dc.subjectLandscape-based model development
dc.titleCan Dominant Runoff Generation Mechanisms Be Disentangled Through Hypothesis Testing? Insights From Integrated Hydrological-Hydrodynamic Modeling
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd914d106-6715-40cf-b743-1e240f37dc94
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd914d106-6715-40cf-b743-1e240f37dc94

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cea_Luis_2025_Can_Dominant_Runoff_Generation_Mechanisms_Be_Disentangled_Through_Hypothesis_Testing.pdf
Size:
2.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format