Aero-structural optimization-based tailoring of bridge deck geometry

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.conferenceTitleEngineering Structureses_ES
UDC.departamentoConstrucións e Estruturas Arquitectónicas, Civís e Aeronáuticases_ES
UDC.grupoInvMecánica de Estruturas (ME)es_ES
UDC.institutoCentroCITEEC - Centro de Innovación Tecnolóxica en Edificación e Enxeñaría Civiles_ES
UDC.startPage114067es_ES
UDC.volume270es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCid Montoya, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorKareem, Ahsan
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T15:43:14Z
dc.date.available2024-10-17T15:43:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstract[Abstract:] The deck cross-section is usually identified in engineering practice as the most important design variable in the wind-resistant design of long-span bridges. This is certainly true in most cases since it controls the aerodynamic and mechanical contribution of the deck to the global bridge performance. However, the effectiveness of deck shape modifications to handle the aeroelastic constraints is highly influenced by the aeroelastic performance requirements. This paper seeks to delve into the aero-structural design optimization of long-span bridges by analyzing possible design scenarios depending on the ability of the deck shape to meet the imposed aeroelastic requirements. A long-span cable-stayed bridge is optimized focusing on the buffeting response and considering different sets of limit values for the design constraints. According to the effectiveness of the deck shape design variables and other size design variables to manage the aeroelastic design constraints, three types of aero-structural optimization problems are identified: type I, aeroelastic constraints are not active and structural constraints drive the design; type II, aeroelastic constraints are active and effectively controlled by deck shape modifications; and type III, aeroelastic constraints are active and demand both shape and size modifications. The engineering significance for practical design is discussed.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipM. Cid Montoya was funded by the Xunta de Galicia (Galician regional government) and the Fulbright Scholar Program with reference ED481B2018/053. S. Hernández was funded by the Xunta de Galicia, including FEDER funding, with reference ED431C 2017/72. A. Kareem especially thanks NSF support under grant CMMI #1612843. The authors fully acknowledge the support received.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipXunta de Galicia; ED481B2018/053es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipXunta de Galicia; ED431C 2017/72es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEstados Unidos. National Science Foundation; CMMI #1612843es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCid Montoya, Hernández, & Kareem. (2022). Aero-structural optimization-based tailoring of bridge deck geometry. Engineering Structures, 270. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2022.114067es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2022.114067
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/39672
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114067es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 Españaes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAero-structural optimizationes_ES
dc.subjectAeroelasticityes_ES
dc.subjectBuffetinges_ES
dc.subjectWind-resistant designes_ES
dc.subjectSurrogate modelses_ES
dc.subjectDeck shapees_ES
dc.subjectBridge engineeringes_ES
dc.titleAero-structural optimization-based tailoring of bridge deck geometryes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication090fe147-b124-4ba6-842a-bd28540fd120
relation.isAuthorOfPublication129a7f0b-20d3-4151-91c8-20268b326067
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery090fe147-b124-4ba6-842a-bd28540fd120

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CidM_2022_Aero-structural-optimization_ES-270-114067.pdf
Size:
10.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: