Analysis About the Leaks and Explosions of Alternative Fuels

Abstract

[Abstract] The maritime sector is under growing pressure to decarbonize, driving the adoption of alternative fuels such as methane, methanol, ammonia, and hydrogen. This study evaluates their thermal behavior and associated risks using Engineering Equation Solve software for heat transfer modeling and Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres software for dispersion and explosion analysis in pipelines and storage scenarios. Results indicate that methane presents moderate and predictable risks, mainly from thermal effects in fires or Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion events, with low toxicity. Methanol offers the safest operational profile, stable at ambient temperature and easily manageable, though it remains slightly flammable even when diluted. Ammonia shows the greatest toxic hazard, with impact distances reaching several kilometers even when emergency shutoff systems are active. Hydrogen, meanwhile, poses the most severe flammability and explosion risks, capable of autoignition and generating destructive overpressures. Thermal analysis highlights that cryogenic fuels require complex insulation systems, increasing storage costs, while methanol and gaseous hydrogen remain thermally stable but have lower energy density. The study concludes that methanol is the most practical transition fuel, when comparing thermal behavior and associated risks, while hydrogen and ammonia demand further technological and regulatory development. Proper insulation, ventilation, and automatic shutoff systems are essential to ensure safe decarbonization in maritime transport.