Subsidy Policies in a Fertility Choice Model

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoEconomíaes_ES
UDC.endPage449es_ES
UDC.grupoInvOrganizacións Sociais, Institucións e Mercadoses_ES
UDC.institutoCentroECOBAS - Centro de Investigación Interuniversitario en Economía e Empresa para a Sociedadees_ES
UDC.issue4es_ES
UDC.journalTitleAtlantic Economic Journales_ES
UDC.startPage438es_ES
UDC.volume29es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGómez, Manuel A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-02T08:49:53Z
dc.date.available2022-02-02T08:49:53Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.description.abstract[Abstract]: This paper compares the effects that a subsidy to health expenditure or a subsidy to childrearing costs has in a fertility choice model in which mortality is also endogenously determined. Whichever subsidy is instituted, the population growth rate rises. While a subsidy to health expenditure reduces welfare, a subsidy to child-rearing costs might increase welfare. The welfare analysis also suggests that a subsidy to health expenditure should be financed by a capital income tax, while a subsidy to child-rearing costs should be financed by a consumption tax.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationGómez, M.A. Subsidy policies in a fertility choice model. Atlantic Economic Journal 29, 438–449 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299332es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0197-4254
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/29526
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299332es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.titleSubsidy Policies in a Fertility Choice Modeles_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication31163bb0-db47-498e-857a-dafffb96ef44
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery31163bb0-db47-498e-857a-dafffb96ef44

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AEJ01.pdf
Size:
178.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: