Use this link to cite:
https://hdl.handle.net/2183/47257 Contribution of mutational resistance mechanisms and acquired β-lactamases to cefiderocol/xeruborbactam susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
González-Pinto, Lucía
Gomis-Font, María Antonia
Pérez-Rodríguez, Gloria
Blanco Martín, Tania
Rodríguez-Pallares, Salud
Sánchez-Peña, Lucía
Beceiro Casas, Alejandro
Jeannot, Katy
Oliver, Antonio
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
González-Pinto L, Gomis-Font MA, Pérez-Rodríguez G, Blanco-Martín T, Rodríguez-Pallares S, Sánchez-Peña L, Beceiro A, Bou G, Jeannot K, Oliver A, Arca-Suárez J. Contribution of mutational resistance mechanisms and acquired β-lactamases to cefiderocol/xeruborbactam susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Dec 10;69(12):e0104825. doi: 10.1128/aac.01048-25.
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Abstract] Cefiderocol/xeruborbactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination in which the siderophore-cephalosporin cefiderocol is paired with xeruborbactam, a broad-spectrum inhibitor that targets class A to D β-lactamases. We evaluated the contribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance mechanisms to cefiderocol/xeruborbactam susceptibility. A panel of 61 P. aeruginosa PAO1 derivatives was tested, including 20 knockout mutants representing key chromosomal resistance mechanisms (e.g., ampC overexpression, efflux upregulation, porin loss, iron uptake deficiency) and 41 transformants producing major circulating β-lactamases. Xeruborbactam was assessed in combination with cefiderocol and cefepime at 4 and 8 mg/L and compared with taniborbactam. Additionally, 99 cefiderocol-resistant clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were evaluated. Cefiderocol/xeruborbactam retained activity against most P. aeruginosa mutants with chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. However, the P. aeruginosa piuC-defective mutant yielded increased cefiderocol minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC = 2 mg/L), which could not be restored by xeruborbactam. Xeruborbactam significantly increased the activity of cefiderocol against the majority of P. aeruginosa PAO1 transformants, including those producing PER-1, SHV-12, KPC Ω-loop mutants, or NDM variants. Cefiderocol/xeruborbactam was active against IMP-type MBLs (which only weakly hydrolyze cefiderocol), including xeruborbactam-resistant enzymes. Relative to taniborbactam, xeruborbactam-based combinations showed similar activity against P. aeruginosa PAO1 transformants, but with slightly higher MIC values when tested against metallo-β-lactamase producers. This MIC increase in xeruborbactam-based combinations was partly because of the constitutive MexAB-OprM efflux in the P. aeruginosa background, as confirmed with P. aeruginosa PAO1 efflux mutants. Importantly, xeruborbactam restored susceptibility in 78% of 99 cefiderocol-resistant P. aeruginosa strains, reducing the MIC90 from 64 to 4 mg/L. Cefiderocol/xeruborbactam shows promising activity against P. aeruginosa.
Description
Editor version
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International







