Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/16276 La Biblioteca de Martín Sarmiento. Distinguir para unir
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
VARELA OROL, Concepción y AMENEIROS RODRÍGUEZ, Rocío. La biblioteca de Martín Sarmiento. Distinguir para unir. Anales de Documentación [en línea], vol. 19. no. 1. [Fecha de consulta: marzo 2016]. Disponible en: http://revistas.um.es/analesdoc/article/view/242061/190331
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Resumen] Se estudia el catálogo de los libros de la biblioteca de Martín Sarmiento redactado por el propio autor,
especialmente la ordenación temática del mismo y la disposición de los libros dentro de cada materia,
relacionándolas también con otros sistemas de clasificación propuestos por él. Finalmente se ofrece una visión
global de la composición de la biblioteca de acuerdo a las cinco grandes clases en que se dividía la ciencia en el
siglo XVIII. Se concluye que ordenación de los libros y composición de la biblioteca son significativas del propio
autor, de sus preocupaciones por el método y las novedades científicas, y de la fragmentación de la ciencia que
caracteriza al siglo XVIII.
[Abstract] We study the catalogue of Sarmiento’s library written by the author, especially its thematic planning and the layout of books within each subject. We also relate this to other classification systems proposed by him. Finally, we offer an overview of the composition of the library according to the five major classes in which science was divided in the XVIIIth century. We conclude that both arrangement of books and library composition are representative of the author himself, of his interest on the method and on scientific latest innovations, and of the fragmentation of science that characterizes the XVIIIth century.
[Abstract] We study the catalogue of Sarmiento’s library written by the author, especially its thematic planning and the layout of books within each subject. We also relate this to other classification systems proposed by him. Finally, we offer an overview of the composition of the library according to the five major classes in which science was divided in the XVIIIth century. We conclude that both arrangement of books and library composition are representative of the author himself, of his interest on the method and on scientific latest innovations, and of the fragmentation of science that characterizes the XVIIIth century.
Description
Editor version
Rights
Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional







