Validity of clinic blood pressure compared to ambulatory monitoring in hypertensive patients in a primary care setting

UDC.coleccionInvestigación
UDC.departamentoCiencias da Saúde
UDC.endPage118
UDC.grupoInvEnfermería e Coidados da Saúde (INIBIC)
UDC.institutoCentroINIBIC - Instituto de Investigacións Biomédicas de A Coruña
UDC.issue2
UDC.journalTitleBlood Pressure
UDC.startPage111
UDC.volume24
dc.contributor.authorReino-González, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorPita-Fernández, Salvador
dc.contributor.authorCibiriain-Sola, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorSeoane-Pillado, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Calviño, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorPértega-Díaz, Sonia
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-04T10:31:37Z
dc.date.available2026-09-04T10:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-14
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Aims: To determine the validity of the blood pressure (BP) measurement in a primary care setting in comparison with the measurement obtained from 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods: Patients with hypertension (n = 137) were studied in primary care. Immediately after a nurse took two measurements of each patient's BP, the ABPM device was attached. Agreement was determined using the Bland-Altman method and the Kappa index. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated for the manual BP measurement in comparison with ABPM for the purpose of diagnosing uncontrolled BP. Results: The BP values from ABPM were lower than those obtained in the examination room. The difference between the clinic measurement and the ABPM was 18.07 ± 14.6 mmHg (systolic blood pressure, SBP) and 6.3 ± 9.2 mmHg (diastolic blood pressure, DBP). The agreement between the clinic measurement and 24h-ABPM for the purpose of classifying control or uncontrolled BP was 64.2% (Kappa = 0.311). In the case of ABPM, the sensitivity of the measurement in the examination room for diagnosing uncontrolled BP was 80.36%, specificity was 53.09%, positive predictive value 54.22% and negative predictive value 70.63%. Conclusions: Clinic measurements do not have sufficient sensitivity/specificity to be recommended as a single method of BP control in primary care.
dc.identifier.citationReino-González S, Pita-Fernández S, Cibiriain-Sola M, Seoane-Pillado T, López-Calviño B, Pértega-Díaz S. Validity of clinic blood pressure compared to ambulatory monitoring in hypertensive patients in a primary care setting. Blood Press. 2015 Apr;24(2):111-8.
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/08037051.2014.992197
dc.identifier.issn1651-1999
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2183/49161
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2014.992197
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Blood Pressure on [date of publication], available at https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2014.992197
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectAmbulatory blood pressure monitoring
dc.subjectClinic blood pressure
dc.subjectHypertension
dc.titleValidity of clinic blood pressure compared to ambulatory monitoring in hypertensive patients in a primary care setting
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0b534431-253f-4ff1-a1f9-ab7ab88bf4a0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication65347b86-1145-46c6-b113-3dec5738e6ab
relation.isAuthorOfPublication81bb68c9-ac97-4c16-987d-9469586d17ee
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0b534431-253f-4ff1-a1f9-ab7ab88bf4a0

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Reino_Validity_2015.pdf
Size:
591.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Reino_Validity_2015_Suppl
Size:
31.19 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Supplementary material