Numerical evaluation of groundwater flows: MODFLOW vs. FE models

UDC.coleccionInvestigación
UDC.departamentoEnxeñaría Civil
UDC.endPage562
UDC.grupoInvEnxeñaría da Auga e do Medio Ambiente (GEAMA)
UDC.institutoCentroCITEEC - Centro de Innovación Tecnolóxica en Edificación e Enxeñaría Civil
UDC.issue6
UDC.journalTitleJournal of Porous Media
UDC.startPage545
UDC.volume23
dc.contributor.authorVellando, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorJuncosa, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorPadilla, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Rábade, Héctor
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T16:33:36Z
dc.date.available2025-10-01T16:33:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] In this contribution, a finite-element model (FLUMP) that numerically assesses the groundwater flow through porous media is compared with the MODFLOW standard software. FLUMP constitutes a nonlinear MATLAB code developed by the present authors in 2018 that evaluates the flow in unconfined saturated heterogeneous and anisotropic porous media. The model also incorporates a tool for evaluating the free surface flow through the conservation of mass. The present contribution illustrates the benefits of this code through its comparison with the broadly used finite-difference software MODFLOW, highlighting the main benefits of both approaches in the assessment of flow in porous media. In order to do so, Wang's benchmark problem of the lowering reservoir has been used for checking and comparison purposes, after which FLUMP and MODFLOW have been compared in the assessment of the Barces Watershed, a practical case deeply monitored and modeled by the present research team in the last decade. The so-developed code does not claim to take the place of a powerful and broadly employed tool such as MODFLOW, a de facto standard for the international hydrogeologic community, but it just humbly emphasizes the benefits and drawbacks of finite-difference models versus finite-element ones in the resolution of the flow through porous media, and in particular of these two approaches here being considered.
dc.identifier.citationVellando, P., Juncosa, R., Padilla, F., & García-Rábade, H. (2020). Numerical evaluation of groundwater flows: Modflow vs. fe models. Journal of Porous Media, 23(6), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1615/JPORMEDIA.2020033043
dc.identifier.doi10.1615/JPORMEDIA.2020033043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2183/45857
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBegell House
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1615/JPORMEDIA.2020033043
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectGroundwater
dc.subjectSurface flow
dc.subjectFinite elements
dc.subjectMODFLOW
dc.subjectFLUMP
dc.subjectNatural watersheds
dc.subjectBarcés
dc.titleNumerical evaluation of groundwater flows: MODFLOW vs. FE models
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication41b74820-ffd9-47cc-81d1-8ff81a6b690b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication87436746-d950-4be2-976e-e79aa03f4953
relation.isAuthorOfPublication310aac9a-e6a9-4f44-9490-f5661ab477f6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0fefa1f7-ad99-408b-ae74-3b57bb8d48db
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery41b74820-ffd9-47cc-81d1-8ff81a6b690b

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Juncosa_2020_Numerical-evaluation_JoPM-23-6.pdf
Size:
2.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format