Myofascial release therapy in the treatment of occupational mechanical neck pain: a randomized parallel group study

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoFisioterapia, Medicina e Ciencias Biomédicases_ES
UDC.endPage515es_ES
UDC.grupoInvGrupo de Investigación en Terapia Celular e Medicina Rexenerativa (TCMR)es_ES
UDC.grupoInvTerapia Celular e Medicina Rexenerativa (INIBIC)es_ES
UDC.institutoCentroINIBIC - Instituto de Investigacións Biomédicas de A Coruñaes_ES
UDC.issue7es_ES
UDC.journalTitleAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitationes_ES
UDC.startPage507es_ES
UDC.volume95es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Fuentes, Iván
dc.contributor.authorDe-Toro, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Fuentes, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Iris Machado de
dc.contributor.authorMeijide-Faílde, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorFuentes Boquete, Isaac Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-29T11:47:49Z
dc.date.embargoEndDate2017-07-01es_ES
dc.date.embargoLift2017-07-01
dc.date.issued2016-07
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Objective: As myofascial release therapy is currently under development, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of myofascial release therapy with manual therapy for treating occupational mechanical neck pain. Design: A randomized, single-blind parallel group study was developed. The sample (n = 59) was divided into GI, treated with manual therapy, and GII, treated with myofascial release therapy. Variables studied were intensity of neck pain, cervical disability, quality of life, craniovertebral angle, and ranges of cervical motion. Results: At five sessions, clinical significance was observed in both groups for all the variables studied, except for flexion in GI. At this time point, an intergroup statistical difference was observed, which showed that GII had better craniovertebral angle (P = 0.014), flexion (P = 0.021), extension (P = 0.003), right side bending (P = 0.001), and right rotation (P = 0.031). A comparative analysis between therapies after intervention showed statistical differences indicating that GII had better craniovertebral angle (P = 0.000), right (P = 0.000) and left (P = 0.009) side bending, right (P = 0.024) and left (P = 0.046) rotations, and quality of life. Conclusions: The treatment of occupational mechanical neck pain by myofascial release therapy seems to be more effective than manual therapy for correcting the advanced position of the head, recovering range of motion in side bending and rotation, and improving quality of life.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationRodríguez-Fuentes I, De Toro FJ, Rodríguez-Fuentes G, Oliveira IM, Meijide-Failde R, Fuentes-Boquete I. Myofascial release therapy in the treatment of occupational mechanical neck pain: a randomized parallel group study. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 2016;95(7):507-515es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/16970
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWolters Kluweres_ES
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000425es_ES
dc.rightsThis is a non-final version of an article published in final form in the American Journal of Physcial Medicine & Rehabilitationes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectFascia/Pathologyes_ES
dc.subjectManual therapyes_ES
dc.subjectNeck paines_ES
dc.subjectPhysical therapy modalitieses_ES
dc.titleMyofascial release therapy in the treatment of occupational mechanical neck pain: a randomized parallel group studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0e74fe59-0ba6-4c41-8c22-85585a8c9d01
relation.isAuthorOfPublication21a1e28b-52f0-4221-8772-38becb4ff8bd
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb97cdc77-829e-45af-8641-cc62c8553d56
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0e74fe59-0ba6-4c41-8c22-85585a8c9d01

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RodriguezFuentes_MyofascialRelease.pdf
Size:
271.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: