Comparison of Exact Methods and Metaheuristics to Solve the Flexible Job-Shop Assembly Problem in Frigate Shipbuilding

UDC.coleccionInvestigación
UDC.departamentoEmpresa
UDC.departamentoCiencias da Computación e Tecnoloxías da Información
UDC.endPage24
UDC.grupoInvGrupo Integrado de Enxeñaría (GII)
UDC.institutoCentroCIF - Campus Industrial de Ferrol
UDC.institutoCentroCITENI - Centro de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Navais e Industriais
UDC.institutoCentroCITIC - Centro de Investigación de Tecnoloxías da Información e da Comunicación
UDC.journalTitleShips and Offshore Structures
UDC.startPage1
dc.contributor.authorPernas-Álvarez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorBecerra Permuy, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorCrespo Pereira, Diego
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T13:09:21Z
dc.date.available2026-02-18T13:09:21Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-07
dc.descriptionThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Ships and Offshore Structures on 7 Jan. 2026, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2025.2611325
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Frigate shipbuilding requires meticulous scheduling due to unique construction processes, involving numerous tasks and limited resources. Current strategies, particularly those involving block erection on slipways, face bottlenecks in hull assembly due to resource constraints. This study addresses these challenges through an extended formulation of the Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problem with Assemblies (FJSP-A), incorporating limited workshop capacity and a fixed block-erection strategy. We evaluate the performance of exact and heuristic solution methods, comparing a strengthened constraint programming (CP) model, a holistic mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulation, a MILP-based decomposition approach from the literature, and two adapted metaheuristics, a genetic algorithm (GA) and a differential evolution (DE) strategy. While CP consistently delivers the best solutions across objectives, large lower-bound gaps remain in the most complex instances. Metaheuristics, particularly the GA with a sequencing-focused encoding, provide competitive alternatives when faster approximate solutions are required or when problem size or available budget limits the use of exact methods. The results offer practical guidance for selecting optimisation strategies in shipbuilding environments and highlight research avenues for integrating enhanced heuristics or multi-objective approaches into resource-constrained assembly scheduling.
dc.identifier.citationPernas-Álvarez, J., Becerra, J. A., & Crespo-Pereira, D. (2026). Comparison of exact methods and metaheuristics to solve the flexible Job-Shop assembly problem in frigate shipbuilding. Ships and Offshore Structures, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2025.2611325
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17445302.2025.2611325
dc.identifier.issn1754-212X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2183/47445
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2025.2611325
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoed access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectFrigate shipbuilding
dc.subjectFlexible Job-Shop scheduling with assemblies
dc.subjectConstraint programming
dc.subjectMILP
dc.subjectGenetic algorithm
dc.subjectDifferential evolution
dc.titleComparison of Exact Methods and Metaheuristics to Solve the Flexible Job-Shop Assembly Problem in Frigate Shipbuilding
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4a9f289c-9027-4bdf-9a32-eb5697eae284
relation.isAuthorOfPublication95c97b30-6ec1-4ca9-940a-329df7af889d
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione0956b81-4982-4fc5-b068-fda3af8ab3db
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4a9f289c-9027-4bdf-9a32-eb5697eae284

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PernasAlvarez_Javier_2026_Comparison_exact_methods_metaheuristics.pdf
Size:
3.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format