Use this link to cite:
https://hdl.handle.net/2183/46779 Rheological, thermal, and mechanical characterization of fly ash-thermoplastic composites with different coupling agents
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Pardo, S. G., Bernal, C., Ares, A., Abad, M. J., & Cano, J. (2010). Rheological, thermal, and mechanical characterization of fly ash‐thermoplastic composites with different coupling agents. Polymer Composites, 31(10), 1722-1730. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20962
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Abstract] Composite materials were prepared by mixing fly ash obtained from biomass combustion as filler and isotactic polypropylene (PP) as matrix. Three silane-type coupling agents mainly differing in the size of their functional groups were used to improve the compatibility between both components. Uniaxial tensile tests showed that the incorporation of untreated ash into PP led to stiffer but also more brittle and weaker materials, as Young's modulus significantly increased and tensile strength and elongation at break decreased. Furthermore, an enhancement in storage and loss moduli as well as in composite viscosity was observed with the addition of fly ash. Hardness tests and thermal and fracture surface analyzes revealed tensile test results similar to those mentioned earlier. In summary, after analyzing the effects of the three silanes on mechanical, thermal, morphological, and rheological properties, the silane containing the vinyl functional group (XL10) was selected as the most appropriate for the PP/ash composites investigated. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:1722–1730, 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers.
Description
Copyright © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers, Wiley
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: S. García Pardo; C. Bernal; A. Ares;
M.J. Abad; J. Cano. Rheological, thermal and mechanical characterization of fly ashthermoplastic
composites with different coupling agents. Polymer Composites. 31 (10), pp.
1722-1730. Wiley. 2010. DOI: 10.1002/pc.20962. This article may be used for noncommercial
purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-
Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed
into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under
applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The
article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any
embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third
parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be
prohibited.







