Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/34783 Autonomy, Monomania and Free Development of Personality in the Clinical Relationship. to what Extent can the Autonomous Person be Protected?
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Vergara, Oscar. «Autonomy, monomania and free development of personality in the clinical relationship. To what extent can the autonomous person be protected?». Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, 2022, Vol. 1, Núm. 13, https://doi.org/10.34810/rljaev1n13id398678.
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Abstract]: All competent moral agents have a prima facie right to make
their own health decisions. When this competence is lacking, they cease
to be autonomous and someone else may justifiably make decisions for
them in an act of soft paternalism that is generally admitted. The problem
arises when autonomous subjects need to be protected (from themselves).
This type of protection only tends to be admitted in very exceptional
cases, such as suicide attempts, as a form of hard paternalism. So the question
arises as to whether and to what extent this protection can be extended
to certain cases in which the autonomous and competent moral
agent acts according to an uncommonly singular life plan. To answer this
question, we deemed it important to distinguish between freedom and
autonomy, for which purpose we have adopted a eudaimonic approach.
Description
Keywords
Editor version
Rights
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual (by-nc-sa)








