Benchmarking of two three-dimensional numerical models in time/space domain to predict railway-induced ground vibrations

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoEnxeñaría Civiles_ES
UDC.endPage256es_ES
UDC.grupoInvGrupo de Estradas, Xeotecnia e Materiais (CGM)es_ES
UDC.institutoCentroCITEEC - Centro de Innovación Tecnolóxica en Edificación e Enxeñaría Civiles_ES
UDC.journalTitleEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrationes_ES
UDC.startPage245es_ES
UDC.volume20es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFernández Ruiz, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorMedina-Rodríguez, Luis
dc.contributor.authorAlves Costa, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Díaz, Margarita
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-28T18:46:28Z
dc.date.available2024-11-28T18:46:28Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstract[Abstract:] In the last 30 years, the scientific community has developed and proposed different models and numerical approaches for the study of vibrations induced by railway traffic. Most of them are formulated in the frequency/wave number domain and with a 2.5D approach. Three-dimensional numerical models formulated in the time/space domain are less frequently used, mainly due to their high computational cost. Notwithstanding, these models present very attractive characteristics, such as the possibility of considering nonlinear behaviors or the modelling of excess pore pressure and non-homogeneous and non-periodic geometries in the longitudinal direction of the track. In this study, two 3D numerical approaches formulated in the time/space domain are compared and experimentally validated. The first one consists of a finite element approach and the second one of a finite difference approach. The experimental validation in an actual case situated in Carregado (Portugal) shows an acceptable fitting between the numerical results and the actual measurements for both models. However, there are some differences among them. This study therefore includes some recommendations for their use in practical soil dynamics and geotechnical engineering.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationFernández-Ruiz, J., Medina Rodríguez, L. E., Alves Costa, P., & Martínez-Díaz, M. (2021). Benchmarking of two three-dimensional numerical models in time/space domain to predict railway-induced ground vibrations. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20, 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2017-8es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11803-021-2017-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/40426
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2017-8es_ES
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2017-8es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectRailway vibrationses_ES
dc.subjectTime/space domaines_ES
dc.subject3D numerical modeles_ES
dc.subjectFinite difference methodes_ES
dc.subjectImplicit finite element methodes_ES
dc.titleBenchmarking of two three-dimensional numerical models in time/space domain to predict railway-induced ground vibrationses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8269cb24-14f0-45f0-a1bf-0f037be04d35
relation.isAuthorOfPublication33ac940d-ef6f-4436-a9cb-064425009b23
relation.isAuthorOfPublication026d7ec4-50a4-4694-ad93-8c3fb7327169
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8269cb24-14f0-45f0-a1bf-0f037be04d35

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MedinaL_2021_Benchmarking-two-3D_EEaEV-20-245.pdf
Size:
1.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión aceptada