Use this link to cite:
https://hdl.handle.net/2183/46271 Accuracy and Efficiency Comparison of Various Nonlinear Kalman Filters Applied to Multibody Models
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Sanjurjo, E., Naya, M.Á., Blanco-Claraco, J.L. et al. Accuracy and efficiency comparison of various nonlinear Kalman filters applied to multibody models. Nonlinear Dyn 88, 1935–1951 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3354-z
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Abstract] Multibody simulations are already used in many industries to speed up the development of new products. However, improvements in multibody formulations and the continuous increase in inexpensive computational power open new fields of applications for multibody simulations, such as using them as plant models for state observers. The present work introduces a novel state observer developed by combining a multibody model with an indirect Kalman filter. Together with other multibody-based Kalman filters already proposed in the literature, they have been applied to two mechanisms (four- and five-bar linkages) to assess their performance. The accuracy of the estimations and the computational cost are examined under several scenarios: using position or velocity sensors in different configurations, with different sampling rates, and considering different levels of errors in the models assumed by the filters. The aim of this work is to present different options to build a state observer based on a dynamic multibody model, and to provide guidance to select the most suitable option for future applications. All the methods have been implemented as a reusable MATLAB toolkit which has been released as Open Source in https://github.com/MBDS/mbde-matlab.
Description
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3354-z
Editor version
Rights
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017






