Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorMarques, Maria Alina
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-12T10:33:43Z
dc.date.available2011-07-12T10:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationRevista Galega de Filoloxía, 2007, 8: 99-124. ISSN: 1576-2661es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1576-2661
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/7582
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] In the last decades, studies of argumentation have been revitalized as a result of the incre- asing interest in language use and dialogical interaction. Then, some theoretical issues become central. Firstly, the transdisciplinarity of the field points to an important issue: the possible relationship concerning the objects of study developed by Logic, Rhetoric and Language Sciences. Secondly, if speaking is (inter)acting, it is crucial to focus on the dis- tinction between the concept of language argumentativity and the more restricted concept of argumentation as a form of discourse organization. Finally, different approaches of argu- mentation in language (Ducrot’s theory) and in discourse raise the issue of microanalysis and macro-analysis of discourse argumentation. We intend to explore the relationships lin- king those topics of investigation in a particular text, part of a debate of Portuguese Parliamentary Discourse.es_ES
dc.language.isopores_ES
dc.publisherUniversidade da Coruñaes_ES
dc.subjectArgumentaçâoes_ES
dc.subjectArgumentatividadees_ES
dc.subjectLínguaes_ES
dc.subjectDiscursoes_ES
dc.subjectInteraçâoes_ES
dc.subjectArgumentationes_ES
dc.subjectLanguagees_ES
dc.subjectDiscoursees_ES
dc.subjectArgumentativityes_ES
dc.subjectDialogical interactiones_ES
dc.titleDiscordar no Parlamento: estratégias de documentaçâoes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem