Back to Goodwill Amortisation: Impact of the 2016 Spanish Regulation on the Mispricing of Listed Firms

Use this link to cite
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/40788Collections
- Investigación (FEE) [893]
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
Back to Goodwill Amortisation: Impact of the 2016 Spanish Regulation on the Mispricing of Listed FirmsDate
2024Citation
Ruiz-Lamas, F. and Peón, D. (2024), "Back to goodwill amortisation: impact of the 2016 Spanish regulation on the mispricing of listed firms", Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-12-2022-0331
Abstract
[Abstract] Purpose: This article analyses the recent inverse transition from goodwill impairment to goodwill amortisation implemented in Spain in 2016. The authors contribute to the existing literature by describing their differing impact over goodwill and impairment figures and testing the impact of goodwill on balances over stock prices. Design/methodology/approach: First, using a database with all Spanish non-financial firms with positive goodwill on their balance sheets, the authors describe the impact of the regulatory change over goodwill and impairment figures. Second, focussing on listed firms only, the authors study the impact of financial reporting of goodwill and impairment on stock prices. Findings: Average goodwill per company and the share of goodwill over total assets significantly reduced after 2016, but the results cannot be easily extrapolated to listed firms due to lack of data. When testing the impact of potentially inflated goodwill balances on prices, the authors find that investors kept overvaluing firms with inflated goodwill balances also with the amortisation method. Research limitations/implications: The lack of data for listed firms with goodwill in Spain makes it difficult to obtain statistically sound evidence, the results could be biased by the cultural traits of the country and related to the intensity of enforcement and monitoring. Practical implications: This might suggest that the effects of the impairment method linger, so the authors conform to the interpretation that the systematic amortisation paired with a periodic impairment test may lead to accounting that better reflects the underlying economics of goodwill. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, there are no recent articles that analyse this new “turn-around” requiring again the systematic amortisation of goodwill.
Keywords
Goodwill impairment
Goodwill amortisation
IFRS 3
IAS 36
DiD
Security mispricing
Goodwill amortisation
IFRS 3
IAS 36
DiD
Security mispricing
Description
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-12-2022-0331
Editor version
Rights
© 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited. This AAM is provided for your own personal use only. It may not be used for resale, reprinting, systematic distribution, emailing, or for any other commercial purpose without the permission of the publisher.
ISSN
1758-8855