Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorFaraldo-Cabana, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T20:22:09Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T20:22:09Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.citationFaraldo-Cabana, P. (2019). One step forward, two steps back? Social rehabilitation of foreign offenders under Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 10(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284419859657es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2032-2844
dc.identifier.issn2399-293X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/35709
dc.description.abstract[Abstract]: Offenders’ rehabilitation is the declared objective of the transfer of foreign offenders to their country of nationality/origin or permanent residence in Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA. The driving rationale behind is that allowing foreign offenders to serve their sentence close to home is a significant instrument in improving their chances of social rehabilitation. However, there is a contradiction between what it is declared to be the main purpose of these European instruments and their other explicit and implicit objectives, mainly, promoting mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters, reducing prison population and removing undesired aliens. This contradiction mirrors the ambiguous role played by offenders’ consent in the context of transfer procedures, and other aspects that do not entirely fit the purpose of increasing the prospects of rehabilitation of foreign offenders. This article explores the concept of social rehabilitation in both Framework Decisions from the viewpoint that its mention as the main rationale for transfer procedures is one important step towards a more humane model of judicial cooperation in the European Union (EU) area of freedom, security and justice. After an in-depth analysis of the aims underlying the adoption of both instruments, this article contributes to the idea that effectiveness of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, in the case of the EU, and the interest in reducing prison population and getting rid of unwanted foreign offenders, in the case of the issuing member states, are the true governing criteria of transfer procedures. There is a clear risk that social rehabilitation can be used deceptively or as an excuse to effectively deport foreign offenders, in particular where consent is not a requirement. This conclusion situates both Framework Decisions two steps back from their point of origin, the Council of Europe conventions on the matter.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article has been drafted in the framework of the research project RePers – Mutual trust and social rehabilitation in practice, funded by the European Union Justice Programme 2014–2020 – www.eurehabilitation.unito.it.
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/2032284419859657es_ES
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019, © SAGE Publicationses_ES
dc.subjectTransfer of prisonerses_ES
dc.subjectSocial rehabilitationes_ES
dc.subjectProbation and community measureses_ES
dc.subjectMutual recognitiones_ES
dc.subjectForeign offenderses_ES
dc.titleOne step forward, two steps back?: Social Rehabilitation of Foreign Offenders under Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHAes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleNew Journal of European Criminal Lawes_ES
UDC.volume10es_ES
UDC.issue2es_ES
UDC.startPage151es_ES
UDC.endPage167es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2032284419859657


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem