Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorPalomo-López, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorLosa Iglesias, Marta Elena
dc.contributor.authorBecerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLópez-López, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Sanz, David
dc.contributor.authorSan Antolín, Marta
dc.contributor.authorMartiniano, João
dc.contributor.authorCalvo-Lobo, César
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T15:45:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-17T15:45:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPalomo-López, P.; Losa-Iglesias, M.E.; Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, R.; López-López, D.; Rodríguez-Sanz, D.; Ántolín-Gil, M.S.; Martiniano, J.; Calvo-Lobo, C. Reliability and Repeatability of the Assessment of Stress in Nursing Students Instrument in Podiatry Students: A Transcultural Adaptation. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3815. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113815es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/25733
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Background: This study aimed to adapt the Spanish version of the Assessment of Stress in Nursing Students (ASNS) (shorter form) instrument for Spanish podiatry students, labeling the new tool as the Spanish version of Assessment of Stress in Podiatry Students (ASPS). The adaptation for reliability and repeatability included performing the transcultural adaptation process and examining the repeatability and reliability of ASPS when used in a different language. Methods: An internationally recommended translation procedure was used to adapt transculturally this tool. The instrument’s test–retest reliability was evaluated in two sessions that were 10 days apart. Results: After considering each domain’s total score, the reliability and internal consistency were analyzed with Cronbach’s α and intraclass correlation coefficient for a 95% confidence interval. Good internal consistency was reported according to total score (α = 0.8626) and each one of the six domains: (1) the practical activities performance domain showed a Cronbach’s α of 0.8684; (2) professional communication domain, α = 0.8765; (3) time management domain, α = 0.8832; (4) environment domain, α = 0.8974; (5) professional education domain, α =0.873; and (6) theoretical activity domain, α = 0.8787. Test–retest reliability, by paired test of Wilcoxon, was not significant, showing that there were not differences between domain scores (p ≥ 0.05). Lastly, visual distributions of Bland and Altman plots did not provide differences between domains and total scores. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the ASPS showed good repeatability, reliability and acceptability to measure stress parameters for podiatry students.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app10113815es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacionales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectStresses_ES
dc.subjectStudentses_ES
dc.subjectPodiatryes_ES
dc.subjectPsychometricses_ES
dc.subjectReliability studieses_ES
dc.titleReliability and Repeatability of the Assessment of Stress in Nursing Students Instrument in Podiatry Students: A Transcultural Adaptationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleApplied Scienceses_ES
UDC.volume10es_ES
UDC.issue11es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app10113815


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem