Skip navigation
  •  Inicio
  • UDC 
    • Cómo depositar
    • Políticas do RUC
    • FAQ
    • Dereitos de Autor
    • Máis información en INFOguías UDC
  • Percorrer 
    • Comunidades
    • Buscar por:
    • Data de publicación
    • Autor
    • Título
    • Materia
  • Axuda
    • español
    • Gallegan
    • English
  • Acceder
  •  Galego 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  
Ver ítem 
  •   RUC
  • Facultade de Ciencias da Saúde
  • Investigación (FCS)
  • Ver ítem
  •   RUC
  • Facultade de Ciencias da Saúde
  • Investigación (FCS)
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Deictic vs. anaphoric pronouns: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasia in english and tagalog

Thumbnail
Ver/abrir
Markussen_Deitic_2024.pdf (2.743Mb)
Markussen_Deitic_2024_Suppl.docx - Supplementary material (55.69Kb)
Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/40994
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese como Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Coleccións
  • Investigación (FCS) [1293]
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítem
Título
Deictic vs. anaphoric pronouns: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasia in english and tagalog
Autor(es)
Thy, Ane Dine Markussen
Gerona, Jonathan
Martínez-Ferreiro, Silvia
Popov, Srdjan
Boye, Kasper
Data
2024-07-18
Cita bibliográfica
Thy ADM, Gerona J, Martínez-Ferreiro S, Popov S, Boye K. Deictic vs. anaphoric pronouns: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasia in english and tagalog. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jul 18;39(7):909-923.
Resumo
[Abstract] Deictic pronouns refer directly to the extralinguistic world (as in Stop her!), while anaphoric pronouns refer to elements introduced in discourse (as in My best friend is Mary. John adores her.). The distinction is central to linguistic theory and may be central also for understanding aphasia. This paper compares the production of deictic and anaphoric pronouns in fluent aphasia and non-fluent aphasia. It does so both for English and for Tagalog, which allows extensive omission of pronominal arguments. For both languages, the results show a dissociation between deictic and anaphoric pronouns. Non-fluent aphasic speech displays a lower proportion of anaphoric pronouns to non-pronouns than non-brain-damaged speech, while the proportion of deictic pronouns to non-pronouns is either not different (Tagalog) or higher (English). In contrast, fluent aphasic speech displays a higher proportion of deictic pronouns to non-pronouns, while the proportion of anaphoric pronouns is either not different (Tagalog) or lower (English).
Palabras chave
Deixis
Anaphora
Pronouns
Aphasia
Tagalog
 
Versión do editor
https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2024.2368114
Dereitos
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
ISSN
2327-3798

Listar

Todo RUCComunidades e colecciónsPor data de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasGrupo de InvestigaciónTitulaciónEsta colecciónPor data de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasGrupo de InvestigaciónTitulación

A miña conta

AccederRexistro

Estatísticas

Ver Estatísticas de uso
Sherpa
OpenArchives
OAIster
Scholar Google
UNIVERSIDADE DA CORUÑA. Servizo de Biblioteca.    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013 Duraspace - Suxestións