Skip navigation
  •  Home
  • UDC 
    • Getting started
    • RUC Policies
    • FAQ
    • FAQ on Copyright
    • More information at INFOguias UDC
  • Browse 
    • Communities
    • Browse by:
    • Issue Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
  • Help
    • español
    • Gallegan
    • English
  • Login
  •  English 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Facultade de Ciencias da Saúde
  • Investigación (FCS)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Facultade de Ciencias da Saúde
  • Investigación (FCS)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Deictic vs. anaphoric pronouns: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasia in english and tagalog

Thumbnail
View/Open
Markussen_Deitic_2024.pdf (2.743Mb)
Markussen_Deitic_2024_Suppl.docx - Supplementary material (55.69Kb)
Use this link to cite
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/40994
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Collections
  • Investigación (FCS) [1293]
Metadata
Show full item record
Title
Deictic vs. anaphoric pronouns: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasia in english and tagalog
Author(s)
Thy, Ane Dine Markussen
Gerona, Jonathan
Martínez-Ferreiro, Silvia
Popov, Srdjan
Boye, Kasper
Date
2024-07-18
Citation
Thy ADM, Gerona J, Martínez-Ferreiro S, Popov S, Boye K. Deictic vs. anaphoric pronouns: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasia in english and tagalog. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jul 18;39(7):909-923.
Abstract
[Abstract] Deictic pronouns refer directly to the extralinguistic world (as in Stop her!), while anaphoric pronouns refer to elements introduced in discourse (as in My best friend is Mary. John adores her.). The distinction is central to linguistic theory and may be central also for understanding aphasia. This paper compares the production of deictic and anaphoric pronouns in fluent aphasia and non-fluent aphasia. It does so both for English and for Tagalog, which allows extensive omission of pronominal arguments. For both languages, the results show a dissociation between deictic and anaphoric pronouns. Non-fluent aphasic speech displays a lower proportion of anaphoric pronouns to non-pronouns than non-brain-damaged speech, while the proportion of deictic pronouns to non-pronouns is either not different (Tagalog) or higher (English). In contrast, fluent aphasic speech displays a higher proportion of deictic pronouns to non-pronouns, while the proportion of anaphoric pronouns is either not different (Tagalog) or lower (English).
Keywords
Deixis
Anaphora
Pronouns
Aphasia
Tagalog
 
Editor version
https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2024.2368114
Rights
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
ISSN
2327-3798

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsResearch GroupAcademic DegreeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsResearch GroupAcademic Degree

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Sherpa
OpenArchives
OAIster
Scholar Google
UNIVERSIDADE DA CORUÑA. Servizo de Biblioteca.    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013 Duraspace - Send Feedback