Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartínez López, Alba
dc.contributor.authorMarrero, África
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Cruz, Yumara
dc.contributor.authorMíguez González, Marcos
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T17:06:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-10T17:06:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-17
dc.identifier.citationMARTÍNEZ-LÓPEZ, A., MARRERO, Á, MARTÍN-CRUZ, Y. y GONZÁLEZ, M.M. Environmental assessment model for scrubbers versus alternative mitigation systems for feeder vessels in liner shipping. Journal of environmental management, 2022, vol. 321, pp. 115954. ISSN 0301-4797. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115954. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722015274es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/31794
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Implementation of the Global Sulphur Cap (GSC), in January 2020, boosted scrubber installation in vessels to fulfill the new air emission limitations. This increase in scrubbers’ use has intensified concern about its environmental performance. Even though achievement of GSC requirements through this mitigation system has been widely proven, the impact of wash water discharge on the marine environment remains under discussion. In this paper, an assessment environmental model is introduced to quantify in monetary terms the performance of feeder vessels that operate with several mitigation systems. This model attempts to improve traditional air emission evaluations by including the impact of scrubbers’ discharges on the marine environmental. In this way, the analysis not only allows different mitigations systems to be ranked by considering their capacity to reduce air emissions, but also provides further information about the marine eutrophication and ecotoxicity impact from scrubbers’ discharge. Through the model’s application to a regular shipping line between the Canary Islands and the Iberian Peninsula, it was found that, the scrubber, regardless of its operation mode (open- or closed loop), is the most efficient mitigation option after the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) fuel shift. The impact of scrubbers’ discharge was not as significant as expected on the feeder vessel’s total pollution since this provides similar relative weight to the methane emissions from a dual-engine option by operating with LNG. The results also show the need to more closely research the marine eutrophication impact of closed-loop scrubbers. Finally, this paper warns about a significant dispersion on the monetary values of marine ecotoxicity and eutrophication, due to a high dependence of the results on the frameworks’ localization. Consequently, further research is needed on the homogenization of pollution monetization in the marine environment.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115954es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectScrubberses_ES
dc.subjectAir emissionses_ES
dc.subjectMarine eutrophicationes_ES
dc.subjectMarine ecotoxicityes_ES
dc.subjectMarine mitigation systemses_ES
dc.subjectRegular shippinges_ES
dc.titleEnvironmental assessment model for scrubbers versus alternative mitigation systems for feeder vessels in liner shippinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleJournal of environmental managementes_ES
UDC.volume321es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115954


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem