Skip navigation
  •  Home
  • UDC 
    • Getting started
    • RUC Policies
    • FAQ
    • FAQ on Copyright
    • More information at INFOguias UDC
  • Browse 
    • Communities
    • Browse by:
    • Issue Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
  • Help
    • español
    • Gallegan
    • English
  • Login
  •  English 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Facultade de Ciencias da Saúde
  • Investigación (FCS)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Facultade de Ciencias da Saúde
  • Investigación (FCS)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Patients' perceptions on shared decision making during prescription of subcutaneous biological drug treatments for inflammatory arthritis: the RHEU-LIFE survey

Thumbnail
View/Open
deToro_Patients.pdf (371.8Kb)
Use this link to cite
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/30650
Collections
  • Investigación (FCS) [1293]
Metadata
Show full item record
Title
Patients' perceptions on shared decision making during prescription of subcutaneous biological drug treatments for inflammatory arthritis: the RHEU-LIFE survey
Author(s)
De-Toro, Javier
González, Carlos M.
Cea-Calvo, Luis
Arteaga, María J.
Fernández, Sabela
Carmona, Loreto
Otón, Teresa
Date
2020-08-24
Citation
de Toro J, González CM, Cea-Calvo L, Arteaga MJ, Fernández S, Carmona L, et al. Patients' perceptions on shared decision making during prescription of subcutaneous biological drug treatments for inflammatory arthritis: the RHEU-LIFE survey. Musculoskeletal care. 2020;18(4):568-574
Abstract
[Abstract] Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the preferences of patients with rheumatic diseases and their perceived experience regarding participation in shared decision making (SDM) when they were prescribed a subcutaneous (SC) biological drug. Methods: A printed survey was handed to 1,000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases treated with SC biological drug. The survey included closed questions about preferences regarding decision making and about patients' experience when they were prescribed an SC biological drug. Descriptive statistics were performed with stratification by patient profiles, using chi-square for comparisons between groups. Results: A total of 592 surveys were received (response rate 59.2%, mean age 51.7 years, 57.6% women). Some 28.2% of patients reported preferring to take part in treatment selection, a percentage that was higher in younger patients, in those with higher academic degree and in those who search information in sources different to that of health care professionals. Over half of patients (56.3%) perceived that the rheumatologist considered their opinion when prescribing an SC biological drug, a percentage higher in younger people. Only in 40.8% of cases did the patients' preference match their perception of their participation in the process. No differences were observed by sex, disease or number of biologics. Conclusions: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases want information about their treatments but mostly leave the prescription decision to the rheumatologist. Younger people, or those with higher academic degree, more often want to participate in the SDM. There are discrepancies between patient preferences and perceptions of this process.
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis
Shared decision making
Spondyloarthritis
Subcutaneous biological drugs
Survey
 
Description
Short report
Editor version
https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1499
Rights
This is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at Wiley Online Library. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
ISSN
1478-2189

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsResearch GroupAcademic DegreeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsResearch GroupAcademic Degree

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Sherpa
OpenArchives
OAIster
Scholar Google
UNIVERSIDADE DA CORUÑA. Servizo de Biblioteca.    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013 Duraspace - Send Feedback