The effects of waveform and current direction on the efficacy and test–retest reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation
Ver/ abrir
Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/30639
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC-BY -NC-ND 4.0)
Coleccións
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítemTítulo
The effects of waveform and current direction on the efficacy and test–retest reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulationData
2018-10-06Cita bibliográfica
Davila-Pérez P, Jannati A, Fried PJ, Cudeiro J, Pascual-Leone A. The effects of waveform and current direction on the efficacy and test–retest reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurosci. 2018;393:97-109
Resumo
[Abstract] The pulse waveform and current direction of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) influence its interactions with the neural substrate; however, their role in the efficacy and reliability of single- and paired-pulse TMS measures is not fully understood. We investigated how pulse waveform and current direction affect the efficacy and test–retest reliability of navigated, single- and paired-pulse TMS measures. 23 healthy adults (aged 18–35 years) completed two identical TMS sessions, assessing resting motor threshold (RMT), motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), cortical silent period (cSP), short- and long-interval intra-cortical inhibition (SICI and LICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) using either monophasic posterior–anterior (monoPA; n = 9), monophasic anterior–posterior (monoAP; n = 7), or biphasic (biAP-PA; n = 7) pulses. Averages of each TMS measure were compared across the three groups and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess test–retest reliability. RMT was the lowest and cSP was the longest with biAP-PA pulses, whereas MEP latency was the shortest with monoPA pulses. SICI and LICI had the largest effect with monoPA pulses, whereas only monoAP and biAP-PA pulses resulted in significant ICF. MEP amplitude was more reliable with either monoPA or monoAP than with biAP-PA pulses. LICI was the most reliable with monoAP pulses, whereas ICF was the most reliable with biAP-PA pulses. Waveform/current direction influenced RMT, MEP latency, cSP, SICI, LICI, and ICF, as well as the reliability of MEP amplitude, LICI, and ICF. These results show the importance of considering TMS pulse parameters for optimizing the efficacy and reliability of TMS neurophysiologic measures.
Palabras chave
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Current direction
Monophasic waveform
Biphasic waveform
Paired-pulse
Reliability
Current direction
Monophasic waveform
Biphasic waveform
Paired-pulse
Reliability
Versión do editor
Dereitos
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC-BY -NC-ND 4.0)
ISSN
0306-4522