Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorGómez, Manuel A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-02T08:49:53Z
dc.date.available2022-02-02T08:49:53Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationGómez, M.A. Subsidy policies in a fertility choice model. Atlantic Economic Journal 29, 438–449 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299332es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0197-4254
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/29526
dc.description.abstract[Abstract]: This paper compares the effects that a subsidy to health expenditure or a subsidy to childrearing costs has in a fertility choice model in which mortality is also endogenously determined. Whichever subsidy is instituted, the population growth rate rises. While a subsidy to health expenditure reduces welfare, a subsidy to child-rearing costs might increase welfare. The welfare analysis also suggests that a subsidy to health expenditure should be financed by a capital income tax, while a subsidy to child-rearing costs should be financed by a consumption tax.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299332es_ES
dc.titleSubsidy Policies in a Fertility Choice Modeles_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleAtlantic Economic Journales_ES
UDC.volume29es_ES
UDC.issue4es_ES
UDC.startPage438es_ES
UDC.endPage449es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem