Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Vílchez, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Jiménez, Juan Francisco
dc.contributor.authorPalomo, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorMirabet, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Molina, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorAlmenar-Bonet, Luis
dc.contributor.authorArizón-del-Prado, José M.
dc.contributor.authorRangel-Sousa, Diego
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Villa, Félix
dc.contributor.authorGarrido, Iris P.
dc.contributor.authorFuente, Luis de la
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Bueno, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorSanz-Julve, Marisa
dc.contributor.authorCrespo-Leiro, María Generosa
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-18T10:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01
dc.identifier.citationGonzález Vílchez F, Delgado JF, Palomo J, et al. Conversion from immediate-release tacrolimus to prolonged-release tacrolimus in stable heart transplant patients: a retrospective study. Transplant Proc. 2019; 51(6):1994-2001es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1873-2623
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/24325
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Background Lifelong adherence with post-transplant immunosuppression is challenging, with nonadherence associated with greater acute rejection (AR) risk. Methods This retrospective study evaluated conversion from immediate-release tacrolimus (IRT) to prolonged-release tacrolimus (PRT), between January 2008 and December 2012 in stable adult heart transplant recipients. Cumulative incidence rate (IR) of AR and infection pre- and postconversion, safety, tacrolimus dose and trough levels, concomitant immunosuppression, and PRT discontinuation were analyzed (intention-to-treat population). Results Overall, 467 patients (mean age, 59.3 [SD, 13.3] years) converted to PRT at 5.1 (SD, 4.9) years post transplant and were followed for 3.4 (SD, 1.5) years. During the 6 months post conversion, 5 patients (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.35%–2.48%) had an AR episode and IR was 2.2/100 patient-years (95% CI, 0.91–5.26). Incidence of rejection preconversion varied by time from transplant to conversion. Infection IR was similar post- and preconversion (9.2/100 patient-years [95% CI, 7.4–11.3] vs 10.6/100 patient-years [95% CI, 8.8–12.3], respectively; P = .20). Safety variables remained similar post conversion. The IR of mortality/graft loss was 2.3/100 patient-years (95% CI, 1.7–3.1). Conclusions Conversion from IRT to PRT in heart transplant recipients in Spain was associated with no new safety concerns and appropriate immunosuppressive effectiveness.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.028es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.titleConversion from immediate-release tacrolimus to prolonged-release tacrolimus in stable heart transplant patients: a retrospective studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.date.embargoEndDate2020-07-01es_ES
dc.date.embargoLift2020-07-01
UDC.journalTitleTransplantation Proceedingses_ES
UDC.volume51es_ES
UDC.issue6es_ES
UDC.startPage1994es_ES
UDC.endPage2001es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem