Skip navigation
  •  Home
  • UDC 
    • Getting started
    • RUC Policies
    • FAQ
    • FAQ on Copyright
    • More information at INFOguias UDC
  • Browse 
    • Communities
    • Browse by:
    • Issue Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
  • Help
    • español
    • Gallegan
    • English
  • Login
  •  English 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Facultade de Ciencias da Saúde
  • Investigación (FCS)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Facultade de Ciencias da Saúde
  • Investigación (FCS)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Controlled trial on the effect of 10 days low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor signs in Parkinson´s disease

Thumbnail
View/Open
Arias_ControlledTrial.pdf (221.4Kb)
Use this link to cite
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/14505
Collections
  • Investigación (FCS) [1293]
Metadata
Show full item record
Title
Controlled trial on the effect of 10 days low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor signs in Parkinson´s disease
Author(s)
Arias, Pablo
Vivas-Costa, Jamile
Grieve, Kenneth
Cudeiro, Javier
Date
2010-07-28
Citation
Arias P, Vivas J, Grieve KL, Cudeiro J. Controlled trial on the effect of 10 days low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor signs in Parkinson´s disease. Mov Disord. 2010;25(12):1830-38.
Abstract
[Abstract] We evaluated the effect of low-frequency rTMS on motor signs in Parkinson’s disease (PD), under a doubleblind placebo-controlled trial design. PD patients were randomly assigned to received either real (n 5 9) or sham (n 5 9) rTMS for 10 days. Each session comprises two trains of 50 stimuli each delivered at 1 Hz and at 90% of daily rest motor threshold using a large circular coil over the vertex. The effect of the stimulation, delivered during the ON-period, was evaluated during both ON and OFF periods. Tests were carried out before and after the stimulation period, and again 1 week after. The effect of the stimulation was evaluated through several gait variables (cadence, step amplitude, velocity, the CVstride-time, and the turn time), hand dexterity, and also the total and motor sections of the UPDRS. Only the total and motor section of the UPDRS and the turn time during gait were affected by the stimulation, the effect appearing during either ON or OFF evaluation, and most importantly, equally displayed in both real and sham group. The rest of the variables were not influenced. We conclude the protocol of stimulation used, different from most protocols that apply larger amount of stimuli, but very similar to some previously reported to have excellent results, has no therapeutic value and should be abandoned. This contrasts with the positive reported effects using higher frequency and focal coils. Our work also reinforces the need for sham stimulation when evaluating the therapeutic effect of rTMS.
Keywords
TMS
Parkinson's disease
Therapy
Motor recovery
 
Editor version
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.23055
Rights
This is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at Wiley. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Condiitons for self-archiving.

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsResearch GroupAcademic DegreeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsResearch GroupAcademic Degree

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Sherpa
OpenArchives
OAIster
Scholar Google
UNIVERSIDADE DA CORUÑA. Servizo de Biblioteca.    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013 Duraspace - Send Feedback